LLM Rank.top

Leaderboard · Compare · Phi-4 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · Updated

Phi-4 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Phi-4 edges out Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the composite (71.2 vs 64.7). The gap is meaningful but not decisive — see the per-benchmark breakdown below.

Phi-4 · composite 71.2 Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · composite 64.7 open-weights vs open-weights
Try Phi-4 → Try Llama 3.3 70B Instruct → A/B test both via OpenRouter →

At a glance

SpecPhi-4Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftMeta
Released2024-122024-12
Tieropen-weightsopen-weights
LicenseOpen · MITOpen · Llama 3.3 Community License
Context window16.384k128k
$ in / out (per 1M)$0.07 / $0.14$0.23 / $0.40

Benchmark scoreboard

Higher is better on every benchmark. Δ shows Phi-4 − Llama 3.3 70B Instruct.

BenchmarkPhi-4Llama 3.3 70B InstructΔ
Chatbot Arena Elo N/A 1257
MMLU-Pro 70.4 68.9 +1.5
GPQA Diamond 56.1 50.5 +5.6
MATH 80.4 77.0 +3.4
HumanEval 82.6 88.4 -5.8
SWE-Bench Verified N/A N/A

Numbers compiled from provider technical reports and Chatbot Arena snapshots — see methodology.

Don't pick blind — A/B test both models on the same API key.

OpenRouter routes Phi-4, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, and 100+ other LLMs behind a single API key — pay-as-you-go, no monthly minimum, fallback if a provider is down. Try OpenRouter → (affiliate · supports this site)

Phi-4 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: where each one wins

Phi-4 is stronger on

  • MMLU-Pro
  • GPQA
  • MATH

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is stronger on

  • HumanEval

Cost comparison

At 10M tokens/day (50/50 split), Phi-4 costs ~$1.05/day vs $3.15/day for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — Phi-4 is the cheaper pick at this volume.

Verdict

Phi-4 edges out Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the composite (71.2 vs 64.7). The gap is meaningful but not decisive — see the per-benchmark breakdown below.

If you can only pick one and your workload is unclear, route via OpenRouter and switch by request — same key, no lock-in.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Phi-4 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Phi-4 edges out Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the composite (71.2 vs 64.7). The gap is meaningful but not decisive — see the per-benchmark breakdown below. Phi-4 wins on MMLU-Pro, GPQA, MATH; Llama 3.3 70B Instruct wins on HumanEval.

What does Phi-4 cost compared to Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

At 10M tokens/day (50/50 split), Phi-4 costs ~$1.05/day vs $3.15/day for Llama 3.3 70B Instruct — Phi-4 is the cheaper pick at this volume.

What is the context window of Phi-4 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct?

Phi-4: 16.384k tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: 128k tokens. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct has the larger window — useful for long-document RAG and full-codebase prompting.

Is Phi-4 or Llama 3.3 70B Instruct open source?

Phi-4: open weights (MIT). Llama 3.3 70B Instruct: open weights (Llama 3.3 Community License).

Can I try Phi-4 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct on the same API key?

Yes — OpenRouter routes both models behind a single key, so you can A/B test Phi-4 against Llama 3.3 70B Instruct without juggling provider accounts.


Model deep-dives: Phi-4 · Llama 3.3 70B Instruct · Full leaderboard

Spotted out-of-date numbers? Open an issue — corrections usually ship within 24h.

Try Phi-4 and Llama 3.3 70B Instruct now

One API key, both models — switch between them per request and let real traffic pick the winner.

Try Phi-4 → Try Llama 3.3 70B Instruct → A/B test both via OpenRouter →