LLM Rank.top

Leaderboard · Model · Updated

Phi-4

14B small open model — punches well above its weight on STEM benchmarks.

Composite 71.2 Rank #15 of 30 Microsoft open-weights Open-weights (MIT) Released 2024-12
Try Phi-4 → Compare with Qwen2.5-Coder 32B → Or route via OpenRouter →

At a glance

ProviderMicrosoft
Released2024-12
Tieropen-weights
LicenseOpen-weights (MIT)
Modalitiestext
Context window16.384k tokens
Max output16.384k tokens
API price · input$0.07 / 1M tokens
API price · output$0.14 / 1M tokens
Hugging Facemicrosoft/phi-4

Benchmark performance

How Phi-4 stacks up against the current leader (GPT-5) and the median model in the leaderboard:

BenchmarkPhi-4GPT-5Median
Chatbot Arena Elo N/A 1410 1320
MMLU-Pro 70.4 86.8 78.0
GPQA Diamond 56.1 87.3 65.0
MATH 80.4 96.7 78.3
HumanEval 82.6 95.1 92.0
SWE-Bench Verified N/A 74.9 49.0

Numbers compiled from provider technical reports and Chatbot Arena. See methodology for the composite-score formula.

Don't lock in to one provider.

OpenRouter routes your requests across Phi-4, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, and 100+ other models behind a single API key — pay-as-you-go, no monthly minimum. Try OpenRouter → (affiliate · supports this site)

What does Phi-4 cost in practice?

API pricing is $0.07 per 1M input tokens and $0.14 per 1M output tokens. Assuming a 50/50 input/output split, here is what that looks like at three workload sizes:

VolumePer dayPer monthPer year
1M tokens/day$0.11$3.15$38.33
10M tokens/day$1.05$31.50$383.25
100M tokens/day$10.50$315.00$3,833

Strengths & weaknesses

Where it shines

No clear top-tier strengths — this is a mid-pack model.

Where it lags

  • HumanEval: 82.6 (rank #28 of 30, below average)
  • MMLU-Pro: 70.4 (rank #22 of 29, mid-pack)
  • GPQA: 56.1 (rank #19 of 29, mid-pack)

Best alternatives

The closest models to Phi-4 by tier and benchmark score:

ModelScore$ in / outContextAction
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B
Alibaba
68.8 $0.18 / $0.18 131.072k Try → · vs Phi-4
DeepSeek V3
DeepSeek
68.0 $0.27 / $1.10 128k Try → · vs Phi-4
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek
75.4 $0.55 / $2.19 128k Try → · vs Phi-4
Llama 3.1 405B Instruct
Meta
65.7 $2.70 / $2.70 128k Try → · vs Phi-4
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba
65.6 $0.35 / $0.40 131.072k Try → · vs Phi-4

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-4 a good model?

Phi-4 scores 71.2 on the llmrank.top composite (rank #15 of 30). It is competitive with the leaders (GPT-5 tops the board at 86.0). Whether it's the right fit depends on your workload — see the use-case discussion on this page.

How much does Phi-4 cost?

Phi-4 is priced at $0.07 per 1M input tokens and $0.14 per 1M output tokens (USD). For a 10M-token-per-day workload split 50/50, that works out to roughly $1.05/day or $383.25/year.

What is Phi-4's context window?

16.384k tokens. For very long inputs, consider a 1M+ context model like Gemini 2.5 Pro or GPT-4.1.

Is Phi-4 open source?

Yes — released under the MIT license, weights are downloadable from the provider or Hugging Face.

What is Phi-4's SWE-Bench score?

Phi-4 scores not reported on SWE-Bench Verified — the benchmark that measures real-world GitHub issue resolution. Its Chatbot Arena Elo is not reported.

What are the best alternatives to Phi-4?

Closest alternatives by tier and score: Qwen2.5-Coder 32B, DeepSeek V3, DeepSeek R1. See the alternatives section on this page for side-by-side numbers.


Related: Qwen2.5-Coder 32B · DeepSeek V3 · DeepSeek R1 · Full leaderboard

Spotted out-of-date numbers? Open an issue — corrections usually ship within 24h.

Try Phi-4 now

Direct link to the official playground — or use OpenRouter to A/B test it against any other model on a single API key.

Open Microsoft playground → Try via OpenRouter →