LLM Rank.top

Leaderboard · Compare · Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro · Updated

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Opus 4.1 edges out Gemini 2.5 Pro on the composite (83.6 vs 80.9). The gap is meaningful but not decisive — see the per-benchmark breakdown below.

Claude Opus 4.1 · composite 83.6 Gemini 2.5 Pro · composite 80.9 frontier vs frontier
Try Claude Opus 4.1 → Try Gemini 2.5 Pro → A/B test both via OpenRouter →

At a glance

SpecClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 2.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Released2025-082025-03
Tierfrontierfrontier
LicenseClosedClosed
Context window200k2M
$ in / out (per 1M)$15.00 / $75.00$1.25 / $10.00

Benchmark scoreboard

Higher is better on every benchmark. Δ shows Claude Opus 4.1 − Gemini 2.5 Pro.

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1Gemini 2.5 ProΔ
Chatbot Arena Elo 1390 1380 +10
MMLU-Pro 87.0 86.0 +1.0
GPQA Diamond 79.6 84.0 -4.4
MATH 95.0 92.0 +3.0
HumanEval 95.4 92.0 +3.4
SWE-Bench Verified 74.5 63.8 +10.7

Numbers compiled from provider technical reports and Chatbot Arena snapshots — see methodology.

Don't pick blind — A/B test both models on the same API key.

OpenRouter routes Claude Opus 4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and 100+ other LLMs behind a single API key — pay-as-you-go, no monthly minimum, fallback if a provider is down. Try OpenRouter → (affiliate · supports this site)

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: where each one wins

Claude Opus 4.1 is stronger on

  • Arena
  • MMLU-Pro
  • MATH
  • HumanEval
  • SWE-Bench

Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger on

  • GPQA

Cost comparison

At 10M tokens/day (50/50 split), Claude Opus 4.1 costs ~$450.00/day vs $56.25/day for Gemini 2.5 Pro — Gemini 2.5 Pro is the cheaper pick at this volume.

Verdict

Claude Opus 4.1 edges out Gemini 2.5 Pro on the composite (83.6 vs 80.9). The gap is meaningful but not decisive — see the per-benchmark breakdown below.

If you can only pick one and your workload is unclear, route via OpenRouter and switch by request — same key, no lock-in.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1 edges out Gemini 2.5 Pro on the composite (83.6 vs 80.9). The gap is meaningful but not decisive — see the per-benchmark breakdown below. Claude Opus 4.1 wins on Arena, MMLU-Pro, MATH, HumanEval, SWE-Bench; Gemini 2.5 Pro wins on GPQA.

What does Claude Opus 4.1 cost compared to Gemini 2.5 Pro?

At 10M tokens/day (50/50 split), Claude Opus 4.1 costs ~$450.00/day vs $56.25/day for Gemini 2.5 Pro — Gemini 2.5 Pro is the cheaper pick at this volume.

What is the context window of Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Claude Opus 4.1: 200k tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro: 2M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro has the larger window — useful for long-document RAG and full-codebase prompting.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro open source?

Claude Opus 4.1: closed / proprietary. Gemini 2.5 Pro: closed / proprietary.

Can I try Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro on the same API key?

Yes — OpenRouter routes both models behind a single key, so you can A/B test Claude Opus 4.1 against Gemini 2.5 Pro without juggling provider accounts.


Model deep-dives: Claude Opus 4.1 · Gemini 2.5 Pro · Full leaderboard

Spotted out-of-date numbers? Open an issue — corrections usually ship within 24h.

Try Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro now

One API key, both models — switch between them per request and let real traffic pick the winner.

Try Claude Opus 4.1 → Try Gemini 2.5 Pro → A/B test both via OpenRouter →