LLM Rank.top

Leaderboard · Model · Updated

Claude Opus 4.1

Anthropic's top model — class-leading on agentic coding and long-horizon reasoning.

Composite 83.6 Rank #4 of 30 Anthropic frontier Closed / proprietary Released 2025-08
Try Claude Opus 4.1 → Compare with Grok 4 → Or route via OpenRouter →

At a glance

ProviderAnthropic
Released2025-08
Tierfrontier
LicenseClosed / proprietary
Modalitiestext, image
Context window200k tokens
Max output32k tokens
API price · input$15.00 / 1M tokens
API price · output$75.00 / 1M tokens

Benchmark performance

How Claude Opus 4.1 stacks up against the current leader (GPT-5) and the median model in the leaderboard:

BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.1GPT-5Median
Chatbot Arena Elo 1390 1410 1320
MMLU-Pro 87.0 86.8 78.0
GPQA Diamond 79.6 87.3 65.0
MATH 95.0 96.7 78.3
HumanEval 95.4 95.1 92.0
SWE-Bench Verified 74.5 74.9 49.0

Numbers compiled from provider technical reports and Chatbot Arena. See methodology for the composite-score formula.

Don't lock in to one provider.

OpenRouter routes your requests across Claude Opus 4.1, GPT-5, Claude, Gemini, and 100+ other models behind a single API key — pay-as-you-go, no monthly minimum. Try OpenRouter → (affiliate · supports this site)

What does Claude Opus 4.1 cost in practice?

API pricing is $15.00 per 1M input tokens and $75.00 per 1M output tokens. Assuming a 50/50 input/output split, here is what that looks like at three workload sizes:

VolumePer dayPer monthPer year
1M tokens/day$45.00$1,350$16,425
10M tokens/day$450.00$13,500$164,250
100M tokens/day$4,500$135,000$1,642,500

Strengths & weaknesses

Where it shines

  • HumanEval: 95.4 (rank #1 of 30, top tier)
  • MMLU-Pro: 87.0 (rank #1 of 29, top tier)
  • Arena: 1390 (rank #3 of 27, top tier)

Where it lags

No clear weaknesses across published benchmarks.

Best alternatives

The closest models to Claude Opus 4.1 by tier and benchmark score:

ModelScore$ in / outContextAction
Grok 4
xAI
83.6 $3.00 / $15.00 256k Try → · vs Claude
o3
OpenAI
83.7 $2.00 / $8.00 200k Try → · vs Claude
GPT-5
OpenAI
86.0 $1.25 / $10.00 400k Try → · vs Claude
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Google
80.9 $1.25 / $10.00 2M Try → · vs Claude
o1
OpenAI
75.7 $15.00 / $60.00 200k Try → · vs Claude

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude Opus 4.1 a good model?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores 83.6 on the llmrank.top composite (rank #4 of 30). It is in the top tier (the leader, GPT-5, scores 86.0). Whether it's the right fit depends on your workload — see the use-case discussion on this page.

How much does Claude Opus 4.1 cost?

Claude Opus 4.1 is priced at $15.00 per 1M input tokens and $75.00 per 1M output tokens (USD). For a 10M-token-per-day workload split 50/50, that works out to roughly $450.00/day or $164,250/year.

What is Claude Opus 4.1's context window?

200k tokens. That covers most multi-document workloads.

Is Claude Opus 4.1 open source?

No — it is a closed (proprietary) model accessed only via the provider API.

What is Claude Opus 4.1's SWE-Bench score?

Claude Opus 4.1 scores 74.5% on SWE-Bench Verified — the benchmark that measures real-world GitHub issue resolution. Its Chatbot Arena Elo is 1390.

What are the best alternatives to Claude Opus 4.1?

Closest alternatives by tier and score: Grok 4, o3, GPT-5. See the alternatives section on this page for side-by-side numbers.


Related: Grok 4 · o3 · GPT-5 · Full leaderboard

Spotted out-of-date numbers? Open an issue — corrections usually ship within 24h.

Try Claude Opus 4.1 now

Direct link to the official playground — or use OpenRouter to A/B test it against any other model on a single API key.

Open Anthropic playground → Try via OpenRouter →